Defensive Burying as a Function of Single-and Paired-Animal Testing Conditions
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of General Psychology
- Vol. 106 (1) , 109-114
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1982.9710979
Abstract
Studied the relationship between single- and paired-animal testing in the defensive-burying situation. Twenty male Holtzman rats received defensive burying testing both individually and in pairs. Testing took place in a rectangular enclosure having a bedding-material floor. The discharge of a flashbulb served as the aversive stimulus. Individual testing resulted in significantly (p < .01) longer burying durations and greater accumulation of bedding material around the aversive stimulus. Whether Ss were individually tested before or after their paired-animal test session did not significantly influence their individual burying scores. Results indicate that individual Ss do not indiscriminately attack various aspects of the environment, and that the presence of a second animal shifts the focus of aggressive attention from the environment to the other animal.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conditioning and retention of defensive burying as a function of Elavil and Thorazine injectionBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1981
- Defensive burying: A cross-species replication and extensionBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980
- Defensive burying and approach-avoidance behavior in the ratBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980
- Defensive burying as a function of insulin-induced hypoglycemia and type of aversive stimulationBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980
- Conditioned defensive burying in rats: Availability of burying materialsLearning & Behavior, 1979
- Conditioned and unconditioned defensive burying in the ratLearning and Motivation, 1979
- Burying as a defensive response in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1978
- A Note on Long Enduring Emotional Responses in the RatThe Journal of Psychology, 1939