The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the new WHO classification
Top Cited Papers
- 16 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 48 (1) , 3-12
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02284.x
Abstract
Tumour classifications have become an integral part of modern oncology and, for pathologists, they provide guidelines which facilitate diagnostic and prognostic reproducibility. In many organ systems and most especially over the past decade or so, the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications have become pre‐eminent, partly enabled by the timely publication of new ‘blue books’ which now incorporate detailed text and copious illustrations. The new WHO classification of soft tissue tumours was introduced in late 2002 and, because it represents a broad consensus view, it has gained widespread acceptance. This review summarizes the changes, both major and minor, which were introduced and briefly describes the significant number of tumour types which have been first recognized or properly characterized during the past decade. Arguably the four most significant conceptual advances have been: (i) the formal recognition that morphologically benign lesions (such as cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma) may very rarely metastasize; (ii) the general acceptance that most pleomorphic sarcomas can be meaningfully subclassified and that so‐called malignant fibrous histiocytoma is not a definable entity, but instead represents a wastebasket of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, accounting for no more than 5% of adult soft tissue sarcomas; (iii) the acknowledgement that most lesions formerly known as haemangiopericytoma show no evidence of pericytic differentiation and, instead, are fibroblastic in nature and form a morphological continuum with solitary fibrous tumour; and (iv) the increasing appreciation that not only do we not know from which cell type(s) most soft tissue tumours originate (histogenesis) but, for many, we do not recognize their line of differentiation or lineage—hence an increasing number of tumours are placed in the ‘uncertain differentiation’ category.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinicopathologic and molecular genetic characterization of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and cloning of a novel FUS/CREB3L1 fusion geneLaboratory Investigation, 2005
- Retroperitoneal LeiomyomasThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2001
- Do Leiomyomas of Deep Soft Tissue Exist?The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2001
- Metastasizing Fibrous Histiocytoma of the Skin: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Three CasesLaboratory Investigation, 2000
- Ectopic hamartomatous thymomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1984
- Atypical lipoma, atypical intramuscular lipoma, and well differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.A reappraisal of 30 cases formerly classified as well differentiated liposarcomaCancer, 1979
- MYXOFIBROSARCOMAActa Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section A Pathology, 1977