Bupropion-SR, Sertraline, or Venlafaxine-XR after Failure of SSRIs for Depression
Top Cited Papers
- 23 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 354 (12) , 1231-1242
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa052963
Abstract
After unsuccessful treatment for depression with a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), it is not known whether switching to one antidepressant is more effective than switching to another. We randomly assigned 727 adult outpatients with a nonpsychotic major depressive disorder who had no remission of symptoms or could not tolerate the SSRI citalopram to receive one of the following drugs for up to 14 weeks: sustained-release bupropion (239 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 400 mg, sertraline (238 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 200 mg, or extended-release venlafaxine (250 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 375 mg. The study was conducted in 18 primary and 23 psychiatric care settings. The primary outcome was symptom remission, defined by a total score of 7 or less on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) at the end of the study. Scores on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology — Self Report (QIDS-SR-16), obtained at treatment visits, determined secondary outcomes, including remission (a score of 5 or less at exit) and response (a reduction of 50 percent or more on baseline scores). Remission rates as assessed by the HRSD-17 and the QIDS-SR-16, respectively, were 21.3 percent and 25.5 percent for sustained-release bupropion, 17.6 percent and 26.6 percent for sertraline, and 24.8 percent and 25.0 percent for extended-release venlafaxine. QIDS-SR-16 response rates were 26.1 percent for sustained-release bupropion, 26.7 percent for sertraline, and 28.2 percent for extended-release venlafaxine. These treatments did not differ significantly with respect to outcomes, tolerability, or adverse events. After unsuccessful treatment with an SSRI, approximately one in four patients had a remission of symptoms after switching to another antidepressant. Any one of the medications in the study provided a reasonable second-step choice for patients with depression. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00021528.)Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and designControlled Clinical Trials, 2004
- Background and rationale for the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR∗D) studyPsychiatric Clinics of North America, 2003
- Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: Equipoise-stratified randomizationBiological Psychiatry, 2001
- Citalopram treatment of fluoxetine nonresponders.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2001
- Efficacy and Safety of Mirtazapine in Major Depressive Disorder Patients After SSRI Treatment FailureThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2001
- Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
- Fluoxetine Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Failed Initial Treatment With SertralineThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 1997
- Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in resistant major depression: A double-blind comparison of brofaromine and tranylcypromine in patients resistant to tricyclic antidepressantsJournal of Affective Disorders, 1993
- Treatment strategy in depressionActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1988
- Treatment strategy in depressionActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1988