Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 December 2005
- Vol. 106 (3) , 589-598
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21616
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consultant gynecologic oncologists from the regional Comprehensive Cancer Center assisted community gynecologists in the surgical treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma when they were invited. For this report, the authors evaluated the effects of primary surgery by a gynecologic oncologist on treatment outcome. METHODS The hospital files from 680 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who were diagnosed between 1994 and 1997 in the northern part of the Netherlands were abstracted. Treatment results were analyzed according to the operating physician's education by using survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Primary surgery was performed on 184 patients by gynecologic oncologists, and on 328 patients by general gynecologists. Gynecologic oncologists followed surgical guidelines more strictly compared with general gynecologists (patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage I–II disease, 55% vs. 33% [P = 0.01]; patients with FIGO Stage III disease, 60% vs. 40% [P = 0.003]) and more often removed all macroscopic tumor in patients with FIGO Stage III disease (24% vs. 12%; P = 0.02). When patients were stratified according to FIGO stage, the 5-year overall survival rate was 86% versus 70% (P = 0.03) for patients with Stage I–II disease and 21% versus 13% (P = 0.02) for patients with Stage III–IV disease who underwent surgery by gynecologic oncologists and general gynecologists, respectively. The hazards ratio for patients who underwent surgery by gynecologic oncologists was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.61–1.03; adjusted for patient age, disease stage, type of hospital, and chemotherapy); when patients age 75 years and older were excluded, the hazards ratio fell to 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.94) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS The surgical treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma by gynecologic oncologists occurred more often according to surgical guidelines, tumor removal more often was complete, and survival was improved. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of Referral Guidelines for Women With Pelvic MassesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Clinical practice guidelines: Loss of clinical freedom or a coming of age?International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2002
- A Population-Based Study of Patterns of Care for Ovarian Cancer: Who Is Seen by a Gynecologic Oncologist and Who Is Not?Gynecologic Oncology, 2002
- What Are the Current Surgical Objectives, Strategies, and Technical Capabilities of Gynecologic Oncologists Treating Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer?Gynecologic Oncology, 2001
- Management and survival of ovarian cancer patients in South East EnglandEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- What changes in the organisation of cancer services will improve the outcome for women with ovarian cancer?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- National survey of ovarian carcinoma part V. The impact of physician's specialty on patients' survivalCancer, 1993
- Ovarian cancer staging: Does it require a gynecologic oncologist?Gynecologic Oncology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- AnnouncementGynecologic Oncology, 1986