The Archaeological Survey: A Defense
- 20 January 1966
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 31 (3Part1) , 313-333
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2694734
Abstract
It is suggested that four major types of survey can be identified: (1) reconnaissance, which is extensive rather than intensive, and results in a catalog of sites; (2) survey which is done in conjunction with a specific program of excavation and is designed to increase the sample of material culture; (3) limited survey that is problem oriented and is conducted for a specific reason (this is usually the most successful type); and (4) survey that involves intensive study of a local area and is designed to extract all possible information from each site found. It is believed that the last type, despite a large expenditure of time and funds, provides much more information than other types of survey. Data from a survey of Cebolleta Mesa, New Mexico, are presented to document the value of the intensive archaeological survey.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physics and ArchaeologyPhysics Today, 1961
- The Development of Scientific Investigation of the Cebolleta Mesa Area, Central Western New MexicoKIVA, 1952
- A Hundred Years of ArchaeologyThe South African Archaeological Bulletin, 1950
- Archaeology of the San Augustin Plains, a Preliminary ReportAmerican Antiquity, 1949
- The Distinctive Features and Distribution of the San Juan Anasazi CultureSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1946
- The Typological ConceptAmerican Antiquity, 1944
- The San José Non-Ceramic Culture and Its Relation to a Puebloan Culture in New MexicoAmerican Antiquity, 1943
- Sand Dunes and Alluvium near Grants, New MexicoAmerican Antiquity, 1943
- Relations between Ethnology and Archaeology in the SouthwestAmerican Antiquity, 1940
- Circular kivas near Hawikuh, New MexicoPublished by Smithsonian Institution ,1923