Hip replacement in obese patients
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 58 (3) , 223-225
- https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146470
Abstract
In a 5-year follow-up study of 125 hip replacements a. m. Lubinus, 41 obese and 84 nonobese patients were compared. Peroperative blood loss was greater in the obese patients. There was, however, no difference in the operation or hospitalization times between the compared groups. There was no infection, wound dehiscence, or delay in wound healing. No deaths occurred during the immediate postoperative period. The obese patients had a lower preoperative walking-ability score. At follow-up, this difference was eliminated. Radiographic signs of loosening were equally common in the compared groups. Three patients, two of whom were in the nonobese group, had been reoperated on because of prosthetic loosening. Our results indicate that obesity does not increase the risk of surgical complication or prosthetic loosening in hip replacement.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biomechanical factors in loosening of the Stanmore hipActa Orthopaedica, 1985
- Survival of Patients and Prostheses after Total Hip ArthroplastyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1983
- Factors Leading to Rearthroplasty in a Material with Radiographically Loose Total Hip ProsthesesActa Orthopaedica, 1983
- Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1982
- Fractured Stem in Total Hip Replacement:A Clinical Review of 120 CasesActa Orthopaedica, 1982
- Weight Reduction Before hip ReplacementActa Orthopaedica, 1980
- Pulmonary and Circulatory Reactions During Total Hip Replacement SurgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1975
- Complications Following Surgery for Duodenal Ulcer in Obese PatientsArchives of Surgery, 1972
- THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LOW-FRICTION ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP PERFORMED AS A PRIMARY INTERVENTIONThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1972