Pre-emptive Treatment for Cytomegalovirus Viremia to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 81 (2) , 139-145
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000183970.71366.da
Abstract
Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Preemptive treatment with antiviral agents of patients with CMV viremia has been widely adopted as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment in preventing symptomatic CMV disease. Methods. The Cochrane CENTRAL Registry, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists were searched for randomized trials of preemptive treatment in solid organ transplant recipients. Two authors extracted all data; analysis was with a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. Ten eligible trials (476 patients) were identified, six of preemptive treatment versus placebo or standard care (treatment of CMV when disease occurred), three of preemptive treatment versus antiviral prophylaxis and one of oral versus intravenous preemptive treatment. Compared with placebo or standard care, preemptive treatment significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease (6 trials, 288 patients, RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.80) but not acute rejection (3 trials, 185 patients, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 176 patients, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.30). Comparative trials of preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis showed no significant difference in the risks of CMV disease (2 trials, 151 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.65), acute rejection (1 trial, 70 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.09) or all-cause mortality (3 trials, 151 patients, RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.72). Conclusions. Few randomized trials have evaluated the effects of preemptive therapy to prevent CMV disease. Preemptive therapy is effective compared with placebo or standard care, but additional head-to-head trials are required to determine the relative benefits and harms of preemptive therapy and prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Preemptive Use of Oral Ganciclovir to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Infection in Liver Transplant Patients: A Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Prophylaxis for CMV should not now replace pre‐emptive therapy in solid organ transplantationReviews in Medical Virology, 2001
- CYTOMEGALOVIRUS ANTIGENEMIA DIRECTED PRE-EMPTIVE PROPHYLAXIS WITH ORAL VERSUS I.V. GANCICLOVIR FOR THE PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1Transplantation, 2000
- Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among recipients of solid-organ transplantsThe Lancet, 2000
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- High-Dose Acyclovir Compared with Short-Course Preemptive Ganciclovir Therapy To Prevent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Liver Transplant RecipientsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- SYMPTOMATIC CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN THE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS ANTIBODY SEROPOSITIVE RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT TREATED WITH OKT31,2Transplantation, 1992
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986