Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial
- 19 April 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 37 (6) , 1598-1603
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01207-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- One-Year Follow-Up of The Stent Restenosis (STRESS I) Study 11This study was supported in part by Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems (Cordis), Incorporated, Warren, New Jersey.The American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Long-Term (4- to 6-Year) Outcome of Palmaz-Schatz Stenting: Paucity of Late Clinical Stent-Related ProblemsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stentingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: One-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- A Comparison of Balloon-Expandable-Stent Implantation with Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. Initial results of a multicenter study.Circulation, 1991
- Estimation of a Common Effect Parameter from Sparse Follow-Up DataPublished by JSTOR ,1985
- Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale.Circulation, 1981
- The Electrocardiogram in Population StudiesCirculation, 1960