Atmospheric Circulation and Its Effect on Arctic Sea Ice in CCSM3 Simulations at Medium and High Resolution*
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 19 (11) , 2415-2436
- https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3753.1
Abstract
The simulation of Arctic sea ice and surface winds changes significantly when Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) resolution is increased from T42 (∼2.8°) to T85 (∼1.4°). At T42 resolution, Arctic sea ice is too thick off the Siberian coast and too thin along the Canadian coast. Both of these biases are reduced at T85 resolution. The most prominent surface wind difference is the erroneous North Polar summer anticyclone, present at T42 but absent at T85. An offline sea ice model is used to study the effect of the surface winds on sea ice thickness. In this model, the surface wind stress is prescribed alternately from reanalysis and the T42 and T85 simulations. In the offline model, CCSM3 surface wind biases have a dramatic effect on sea ice distribution: with reanalysis surface winds annual-mean ice thickness is greatest along the Canadian coast, but with CCSM3 winds thickness is greater on the Siberian side. A significant difference between the two CCSM3-forced offline simulations is... Abstract The simulation of Arctic sea ice and surface winds changes significantly when Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) resolution is increased from T42 (∼2.8°) to T85 (∼1.4°). At T42 resolution, Arctic sea ice is too thick off the Siberian coast and too thin along the Canadian coast. Both of these biases are reduced at T85 resolution. The most prominent surface wind difference is the erroneous North Polar summer anticyclone, present at T42 but absent at T85. An offline sea ice model is used to study the effect of the surface winds on sea ice thickness. In this model, the surface wind stress is prescribed alternately from reanalysis and the T42 and T85 simulations. In the offline model, CCSM3 surface wind biases have a dramatic effect on sea ice distribution: with reanalysis surface winds annual-mean ice thickness is greatest along the Canadian coast, but with CCSM3 winds thickness is greater on the Siberian side. A significant difference between the two CCSM3-forced offline simulations is...Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3)Journal of Climate, 2006
- The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3)Journal of Climate, 2006
- The Community Land Model and Its Climate Statistics as a Component of the Community Climate System ModelJournal of Climate, 2006
- Maintenance of the Sea-Ice EdgeJournal of Climate, 2005
- Sea Ice Response to Wind Forcing from AMIP ModelsJournal of Climate, 2002
- Simulating the ice‐thickness distribution in a coupled climate modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2001
- Polar Climate Simulation of the NCAR CCM3*,,+Journal of Climate, 1998
- AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison ProjectBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1992
- Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Model ResolutionJournal of Climate, 1991
- Sea ice thickness distribution in the Arctic OceanCold Regions Science and Technology, 1987