Regression, Prediction and Shrinkage
- 1 July 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Vol. 45 (3) , 311-335
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01258.x
Abstract
Summary: The fit of a regression predictor to new data is nearly always worse than its fit to the original data. Anticipating this shrinkage leads to Stein-type predictors which, under certain assumptions, give a uniformly lower prediction mean squared error than least squares. Shrinkage can be particularly marked when stepwise fitting is used: the shrinkage is then closer to that expected of the full regression rather than of the subset regression actually fitted. Preshrunk predictors for selected subsets are proposed and tested on a number of practical examples. Both multiple and binary (logistic) regression models are considered.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inflation of R 2 in Best Subset RegressionTechnometrics, 1980
- Ridge Regression and James-Stein Estimation: Review and CommentsTechnometrics, 1979
- A Simulation Study of Alternatives to Ordinary Least SquaresJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977
- Predicting Success in the Treatment of PsychopathsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Inadmissibility of Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Some Multiple Regression Problems with Three or More Independent VariablesThe Annals of Statistics, 1973
- On using an estimated regression line in a second sampleBiometrika, 1972
- Generalized Linear ModelsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972
- Statistical studies of prognosis in advanced breast cancerJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1969
- Selection of Variables for Fitting Equations to DataTechnometrics, 1966
- A PROBABILISTIC DERIVATION OF THE NON‐CENTRAL χ2 DISTRIBUTIONAustralian Journal of Statistics, 1965