Venous Thromboembolism in the High-risk Trauma Patient
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Vol. 42 (3) , 463-469
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199703000-00014
Abstract
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are considered to be a major source of morbidity and mortality among trauma patients. Several reports have identified high-risk patients with recommendations for management ranging from frequent duplex scanning to placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. We reviewed our experience with a large trauma population to determine whether such approaches are justified. We analyzed 2,868 consecutive trauma admissions over 22 months and identified 280 patients (10%) in high-risk groups who survived > or = 48 hours: (1) severe closed head injury with mechanical ventilation > or = 72 hours, (2) closed head injury with lower extremity fractures, (3) spinal column/cord injury, (4) combined pelvic and lower extremity fractures, and (5) major infrarenal venous injuries. The remaining nonthermal injury patients constituted the low-risk group. There were 280 high-risk patients, 213 of whom (76%) received prophylaxis with compression therapy. There were 12 cases of DVT (5%) with four nonfatal PE (1.4%). Six patients (2%) had therapeutic IVC filters inserted and only one patient had prophylactic placement. There were 38 deaths in this group, attributable primarily to severe closed head injury or spine injuries, and none were caused by PE. In the 2,249 low-risk patients, there were three cases of DVT (0.1%, p < 0.05 vs. high risk) and no PE (p < 0.05 vs. high risk). Although these patients were at increased risk for thromboembolic events, the overall incidence of DVT was still extremely low with no apparent PE deaths. In our patient population, aggressive screening and prophylactic IVC filters would not have benefited 95% of "high-risk" patients without DVT and would not have prevented any deaths. We could not identify any population, except perhaps venous injuries, where such expensive and potentially harmful maneuvers seemed justified. Our experience with DVT and PE does not support either aggressive screening or prophylactic IVC filters as the standards of care.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence and prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in a high risk trauma populationThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Asymptomatic Deep Venous Thrombosis in the Trauma PatientThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- A Prospective Study of Venous Thromboembolism after Major TraumaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN TRAUMA PATIENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1994
- Prophylactic Vena Cava Filter Insertion in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuryNeurosurgery, 1994
- PROPHYLACTIC VENA CAVA FILTER INSERTION IN SEVERELY INJURED TRAUMA PATIENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- EFFICACY OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS PROPHYLAXIS IN TRAUMA PATIENTS AND IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISK GROUPSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- D-DIMER LEVELS CORRELATE WITH PATHOLOGIC THROMBOSIS IN TRAUMA PATIENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1992
- Thromboembolism Following Multiple TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1992
- Silent deep vein thrombosis in immobilized multiple trauma patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1989