Agricultural Biotechnology's Complementary Intellectual Assets
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 85 (2) , 349-363
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299864
Abstract
We formulate and test a hypothesis for the dramatic restructuring that the plant breeding and seed industry has recently undergone: the reorganization can be explained in part by the desire to exploit complementarities between intellectual assets needed to create genetically modified organisms. This hypothesis is tested using data on agricultural biotechnology patents, notices for field tests of genetically modified organisms, and firm characteristics. The presence of complementarities is identified with a positive covariance in the unexplained variation of asset holdings. Results indicate that coordination of complementary assets has increased under the consolidation of the industry.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995The RAND Journal of Economics, 2001
- Reversal of Fortune? The Recovery of the U.S. Semiconductor IndustryCalifornia Management Review, 1998
- Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical ResearchScience, 1998
- Guiding the Hand That Feeds: Toward Socially Optimal Appropriability in Agricultural Biotechnology InnovationCalifornia Law Review, 1996
- U.S. agricultural biotechnology: Status and prospectsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 1995
- Acquisition as a best-case scenarioNature Biotechnology, 1995
- Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-HowEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 1995
- The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical AnalysisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D RelationshipEconometrica, 1984
- Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity GrowthThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979