Comparison of diltiazem and atenolol in young, physically active men with essential hypertension
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 60 (13) , 1092-1095
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(87)90359-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Nisoldipine on Cardiorespiratory Response to Static and Dynamic Exercise in Essential HypertensionJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1987
- Diltiazem versus propranolol in essential hypertension: Responses of rest and exercise blood pressure and effects on exercise capacityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Effect of dual ??-blockade and calcium antagonism on endurance performanceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1987
- Effects of beta-blockade on exercise capacity of trained and untrained men: a hemodynamic comparisonJournal of Applied Physiology, 1986
- Effects of diltiazem on serum lipids, exercise performance and blood pressure: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation for systemic hypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Age, race, blood pressure and renin: Predictors for antihypertensive treatment with calcium antagonistsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Comparison of atenolol 50 mg and 100 mg as initial treatment in uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertensionEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1985
- Effect of beta1-selective and nonselective beta blockade on blood pressure relative to physical performance in men with systemic hypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Effects of diltiazem on cardiovascular responses during exercise in systemic hypertension and comparison with propranololThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Perceived exertionMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1973