Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Analysis during Screening: Accuracy and Reliability
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 114 (9) , 741-747
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-741
Abstract
To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of lipoprotein-cholesterol measurements obtained during screening. Cross-sectional study. From November 1989 to January 1990, 154 adults were screened. Split venous samples from fasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with screening and standardized laboratory methods. Low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation. Split venous samples from nonfasting participants were analyzed for total cholesterol. Capillary blood samples were analyzed for total cholesterol with the screening method. Total cholesterol measurements in screening venous blood samples were 5.4% and 3.8% lower than the laboratory values in samples from fasting and nonfasting participants, respectively. Triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol values in venous samples obtained from fasting participants were, on average, 9.8% and 11.2% lower than the respective laboratory measurements. Screening HDL-cholesterol values varied, differing from the laboratory values by as much as 40% in 95% of participants. In fasting participants, total cholesterol in capillary samples averaged 5.5% higher than in venous samples; in nonfasting participants the capillary samples were 3.1% higher. Screening for either total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol identified 93% of the persons with LDL-cholesterol values of 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) or higher. Total cholesterol can be reliably measured in samples from fasting or nonfasting persons. The values in capillary blood samples were slightly higher than those in venous samples. Screening HDL-cholesterol values were too variable to establish the HDL-cholesterol level reliably. Participants with high LDL-cholesterol levels were identified as accurately by measuring total cholesterol only when compared with calculating the LDL-cholesterol level from total cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol concentrations.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comprehensive evaluation of the heparin–manganese precipitation procedure for estimating high density lipoprotein cholesterolPublished by Elsevier ,2021
- Accuracy and precision of analyses for total cholesterol as measured with the Reflotron cholesterol method.Clinical Chemistry, 1989
- The Centers for Disease Control-National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program: An Approach to Accurate and Precise Lipid MeasurementsClinics In Laboratory Medicine, 1989
- Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in AdultsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Feasibility of large-scale cholesterol screening: experience with a portable capillary-blood testing device.American Journal of Public Health, 1987
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- The effects of changes in physical activity on major cardiovascular risk factors, hemodynamics, sympathetic function, and glucose utilization in man: a controlled study of four levels of activity.Circulation, 1986
- Lowering Blood Cholesterol to Prevent Heart DiseaseJAMA, 1985
- Treatment of HypertriglyceridemiaJAMA, 1984
- Estimation of the Concentration of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Plasma, Without Use of the Preparative UltracentrifugeClinical Chemistry, 1972