A Comparison of the Practical Utility of Traditional, Statistical, and Hybrid Job Evaluation Approaches.

1 December 1982

journal article
Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal

Vol. 25 (4) , 790-809
https://doi.org/10.2307/256099

Abstract

This study compares the relative accuracy and practical utility of seven different job evaluation approaches. Results of 657 position evaluations indicate that traditional and hybrid systems are at least as accurate, reliable, and objective in predicting grade level as are statistical policy-capturing methods when based on a standardized job analysis tool.

Keywords

JOB EVALUATION
EMPLOYEES -- RATING OF
JOB ANALYSIS
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
JOB DESCRIPTIONS
JOB CLASSIFICATION
TASK ANALYSIS
INDUSTRIAL POLICY
JOB QUALIFICATIONS
BUSINESS FORECASTING

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: