Smaller infarct after preconditioning does not predict extent of early functional improvement of reperfused heart.
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Vol. 277 (5) , H1754-H1761
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.5.h1754
Abstract
We evaluated the ability of ischemic preconditioning to restore function to salvaged myocardium in rabbits. Although ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size, few investigators studying recovery of function after coronary occlusions lasting >/=30 min have reported any mechanical benefit in preconditioned hearts. However, because myocardial function was seldom evaluated beyond 5 h after reperfusion stunning may have masked the benefit. Accordingly, rabbits were chronically instrumented with a pneumatic occluder around a branch of the left coronary artery, a pair of 1-mm ultrasonic crystals in the myocardial territory destined to become ischemic, and electrocardiogram (ECG) leads. One week after surgery the ECG and segment length tracing were recorded at rest, during 30-min occlusion and 1 h of reflow, and again at 24, 48, and 72 h. In ischemically preconditioned rabbits, 5-min coronary occlusion and 10-min reperfusion preceded the long occlusion. The beginning and end of systole were determined by recording the first and second heart sounds with a hand-held precordial microphone. Postmortem infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium chloride. During the 30-min coronary occlusion all segments became nearly akinetic or bulged during systole. After 60 min of reflow there was little return of function in either group. Between 24 and 72 h there was minimal recovery in the control group (segment shortening equals 13.3 +/- 4.1% of baseline), whereas function was much better in preconditioned hearts (44.2 +/- 7.4% of baseline, P < 0.02). Infarct size as a percentage of risk zone was much smaller in preconditioned hearts (10.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 29.7 +/- 1.8%, P < 0.001). Thus there is a gradual recovery of systolic function of reperfused myocardium after a coronary occlusion. Although early mechanical recovery is significantly better after preconditioning, it is much less than would be predicted by the reduction of infarct size.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attenuation of S-T Segment elevation during repetitive coronary occlusions truly reflects the protection of Ischemic preconditioning and is not an epiphenomenonBasic Research in Cardiology, 1997
- Cardioprotection induced by ischemic preconditioning in the mammalian heart: effects on arrhythmogenesisCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 1997
- Different effects of an adenosine A1 analogue and ischemic preconditioning in isolated rabbit heartsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995
- Ischaemic preconditioning in a model of global ischaemia: Infarct size limitation, but no reduction of stunningJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 1995
- Preconditioning During IschemiaCardiology in Review, 1995
- A new animal model of controlled coronary artery occlusion in conscious rabbitsCardiovascular Research, 1994
- Importance of ischemic preconditioning and collateral circulation for left ventricular functional recovery in patients with successful intracoronary thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1993
- Hypoxic preconditioning of ischaemic canine myocardiumCardiovascular Research, 1992
- Effects of coronary artery reperfusion on regional myocardial blood flow and function in conscious baboons.Circulation, 1985
- Regional myocardial functional and electrophysiological alterations after brief coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1975