Acid–base equilibria in aqueous micellar solutions. Part 2.—Sulphonephthalein indicators
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases
- Vol. 85 (3) , 537-550
- https://doi.org/10.1039/f19898500537
Abstract
The acid–base equilibria of three sulphonephthalein indictors, viz. bromocresol green, bromothymol blue and phenol red, in 1,4-dioxane–water mixtures and aqueous solutions of both non-ionic and cationic micelles have been studied. The difference between the acid–base equilibrium constant of a sulphonephthalein indicator in pure water, pKw a, and the apparent acid–base equilibrium constant of a sulphonephthalein located entirely within the interfacial microenvironment of a non-ionic micelle has been explained quantitatively in terms of the different intrinsic solvent properties of the two systems. A number of factors are considered to be primarily responsible for the difference between the apparent acid–base equilibrium constant of a sulphonephthalein residing with in the interfacial micro-environment of a cationic alkyl quaternary ammonium micelle and its pKw a value. These factors are the electrostatic micellar surface potential, the low effective interfacial dielectric constant and either an interfacial ‘salt-effect’ or the formation of an ion pair between the negatively charged sulphonate group of a sulphonephthalein and a cationic quaternary ammonium surfactant headgroup.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: