Reliability of Tissue Doppler Wall Motion Monitoring After Heart Transplantation for Replacement of Invasive Routine Screenings by Optimally Timed Cardiac Biopsies and Catheterizations
- 18 September 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 104 (suppl 1) , I-184-184
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hc37t1.094855
Abstract
Background Invasive screenings at predefined time intervals for acute rejection and transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) are standard procedures. However, cardiac biopsies and catheterizations are distressing and risky for the patients and are also costly. We assessed the reliability of pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI) for the timing of invasive examinations in heart recipients in an attempt to avoid unnecessary endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) and catheterizations. Methods and Results PW-TDI obtained at the basal left ventricular posterior wall before 408 EMBs and 293 catheterizations was tested for its diagnostic value regarding rejection and TxCAD with the use of International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation biopsy grading, coronary angiography, and intravascular ultrasound as standards. Early diastolic peak wall motion velocity and relaxation time showed high sensitivities for clinically relevant rejection diagnosis (90.0% and 93.3%, respectively). The negative and positive predictive values for rejection of diastolic parameter changes appeared high enough (up to 96% and 92%, respectively) to allow a reliable noninvasive PW-TDI monitoring with efficiently timed, instead of routinely scheduled, EMBs. At definite cutoff values for systolic parameters, the probability for TxCAD reached 92% to 97%. The Fisher classification functions allowed TxCAD exclusion with 80% probability. Conclusions Without diastolic parameter changes, acute rejection can be practically excluded, and serial PW-TDI can save patients from routine EMBs. The high specificity and negative predictive value for TxCAD of reduced systolic peak velocities and extended systolic time allow optimized timed catheterizations. Peak systolic velocity and systolic time allow diagnostic classifications that enable patients without known TxCAD but with high risk for catheterization to be spared routine angiographies.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Usefulness of pulsed Doppler tissue imaging for noninvasive detection of cardiac rejection after heart transplantationTransplantation Proceedings, 1999
- Relationship between coronary function by positron emission tomography and temporal changes in morphology by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in transplant recipientsThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 1999
- Incidence and clinical relevance of coronary calcification detected by electron beam computed tomography in heart transplant recipientsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1999
- Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Early After Heart Transplantation Predicts Development of Allograft Coronary Artery Disease and OutcomeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Wall Motion Velocity with Pulsed Tissue Doppler Imaging: Comparison with Peak dP/dt of the Left Ventricular Pressure CurveJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 1998
- Doppler echocardiography in cardiac transplant patients: Allograft rejection and its relationship to diastolic functionJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 1997
- Clinical Application of Pulsed Doppler Tissue Imaging for Assessing Abnormal Left Ventricular RelaxationPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- Quantitative Doppler tissue imaging for assessment of regional myocardial velocities during transient ischemia and reperfusionAmerican Heart Journal, 1996
- Early diastolic left ventricular function as a marker of acute cardiac rejection: a prospective serial echocardiographic studyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Accelerated coronary vascular disease in the heart transplant patient: Coronary arteriographic findingsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988