The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action
- 1 January 1975
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 34 (9) , 249-264
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2634-2_19
Abstract
Behavior reinforced in the presence of a stimulus comes under the control of the stimulus. A drug can then modify that control and, therefore, modify the behavior itself. Studies over the past 2 decades have shown that the nature of the controlling (or discriminative) stimulus can govern the degree to which drugs change performance. These experiments usually have compared behavior on various schedules of reinforcement with and without added discriminative stimuli. For instance, pigeons that had been trained on a fixed-interval schedule showed great changes in response distribution after amphetamine and scopolamine. The same birds, when performing on a fixed-interval schedule to which time-correlated discriminative stimuli had been added, showed smaller changes in response distribution. Other pigeons were trained to make a minimum number of consecutive responses on one key before a peck on a second key would be reinforced; d-amphetamine and scopolamine led to pronounced increases in premature switching. Adding a discriminative stimulus when the response requirement was fulfilled increased the likelihood that a switch would occur only after the appropriate number of pecks had been emitted. It also attenuated the effects of the drugs. The presence of discriminative stimuli did not make as large a difference in performance in either of these experiments when chlorpromazine and promazine were studied. In general, work with other schedules of reinforcement supports the conclusion that behavior under strong external stimulus control is less apt to be readily affected by many drugs. Addition of the discriminative stimulus can also “improve” the behavior of pigeons that have been given enough methylmercury to increase greatly the variability of their performance. — Laties, V. G. The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action. Federation Proc. 34: 1880–1888, 1975. Keywords Stimulus Control Discriminative Stimulus Multiple Schedule Conditional Probability Function Criminative Stimulus These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scopolamine effects on two-trial delayed-response performance in the ratPsychopharmacology, 1974
- Factors governing the vulnerability of DRL operant performance to the effects of ethanolPsychopharmacology, 1973
- RATE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF DRUGS: MODIFICATION BY DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULI OF THE EFFECTS OF AMOBARBITAL ON SCHEDULE‐CONTROLLED BEHAVIOR1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- ON THE LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE, METHAMPHETAMINE, AND METHYLPHENIDATE IN THE RATJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963
- PROBABILITY RELATIONS WITHIN RESPONSE SEQUENCES UNDER RATIO REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1958
- TECHNIQUE FOR STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON DISCRIMINATION IN THE PIGEONAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1956
- EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON CHARACTERISTICS OF BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY COMPLEX SCHEDULES OF INTERMITTENT POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1956
- DRUG‐BEHAVIOR INTERACTIONAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1956
- MODIFICATION BY DRUGS OF PERFORMANCE ON SIMPLE SCHEDULES OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1956