Door-to-needle time in myocardial infarction: Is there an ideal benchmark?
- 16 September 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 150 (3) , 365-367
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.026
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can the wrong statistic be bad for health? Improving the reporting of door-to-needle time performance in acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Time to Acute Reperfusion Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2004
- ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive SummaryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Improving Quality Improvement Using Achievable Benchmarks For Physician FeedbackJAMA, 2001
- Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the U.S. from 1990 through 1999Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Relationship of Symptom-Onset-to-Balloon Time and Door-to-Balloon Time With Mortality in Patients Undergoing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2000
- Use of Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United StatesCirculation, 1998
- Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patientsPublished by Elsevier ,1994