Further Considerations of “Retention Characteristics of Motor Short-Term Memory Cues”
- 1 June 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Motor Behavior
- Vol. 7 (2) , 151-152
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1975.10735028
Abstract
Laabs (1975) has argued that Marteniuk's (1973) negative findings in opposition to his (1973) model can be explained by a lack of power. While statistical power was low, Marteniuk's results, and those of Jones (1974) as well, demonstrated a very small difference that was contrary to one of Laabs' predictions. It can be concluded this difference was not practically meaningful, suggesting that the Laabs (1973) model may have to be modified.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on “Retention Characteristics of Motor Short-Term Memory Cues”Journal of Motor Behavior, 1975
- Role of central monitoring of efference in short-term memory for movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Retention Characteristics of Motor Short-Term Memory CuesJournal of Motor Behavior, 1973
- Retention characteristics of different reproduction cues in motor short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Decay and interference effects in the short-term retention of a discrete motor act.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970