Helicobacter pylori test and eradicate versus prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients: 6.7 year follow up of a randomised trial
Open Access
- 1 December 2004
- Vol. 53 (12) , 1758-1763
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.043570
Abstract
Background: Dyspepsia is a chronic disease with significant impact on the use of health care resources. A management strategy based on Helicobacter pylori testing has been recommended but the long term effect is unknown. Aim: To investigate the long term effect of a test and treat strategy compared with prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients in primary care. Patients: A total of 500 patients presenting in primary care with dyspepsia were randomised to management by H pylori testing plus eradication therapy (n = 250) or by endoscopy (n = 250). Results of 12 month follow up have previously been presented. Methods: Symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were recorded during a three month period, a median 6.7 years after randomisation (range 6.1–7.3 years). Number of endoscopies, antisecretory medication, H pylori treatments, and hospital visits were recorded from health care databases for the entire follow up period. Results: Median age was 45 years; 28% were H pylori infected. Use of resources was registered in all 500 patients (3084 person years) of whom 312 completed diaries. We found no difference in symptoms between the two groups. Median proportion of days without symptoms was 0.52 (interquartile range 0.10–0.88) in the test and eradicate group versus 0.64 (0.14–0.90) in the prompt endoscopy group (p = 0.27) (mean difference 0.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) −0.03 to 0.14)). Compared with the prompt endoscopy group, the test and eradicate group underwent fewer endoscopies (mean difference 0.62 endoscopies/person (95% CI 0.38–0.86)) and used less antisecretory medication (mean difference 102 defined daily doses/person (95% CI −1 to 205)). Conclusion: On a long term basis, a H pylori test and eradicate strategy is as efficient as prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients in primary care and reduces the use of endoscopy and antisecretory medication.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approach to Treatment of Dyspepsia in Primary CareArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2003
- Empirical prescribing for dyspepsia: randomised controlled trial of test and treat versus omeprazole treatmentBMJ, 2003
- Initial management strategies for dyspepsiaPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection—The Maastricht 2‐2000 Consensus ReportAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002
- SODA (severity of dyspepsia assessment): A new effective outcome measure for dyspepsia-related healthJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primaryBMJ, 2001
- A prospective randomised trial of a “test and treat” policy versus endoscopy based management in youngHelicobacter pylori positive patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, referred to a hospital clinicGut, 1999
- AGA technical review: Evaluation of dyspepsiaGastroenterology, 1998
- Initial endoscopy or empirical therapy with or without testing for Helicobacter pylori for dyspepsia: A decision analysisGastroenterology, 1996
- Empirical H2-blocker therapy or prompt endoscopy in management of dyspepsiaThe Lancet, 1994