Superior oral to written spelling: Evidence for separate buffers?
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Vol. 7 (4) , 347-366
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299008253448
Abstract
A brain-damaged patient with superior oral to written spelling is described. Analysis of error types in the two output forms showed different influences incompatible with Margolin's (1984) proposal that oral and written spelling diverge only after a common buffer. Written spelling was influenced by word/nonword status, but not by regularity of spelling; oral spelling was influenced by regularity but not by word/nonword status. An alternative model is suggested.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selective Preservation of Oral Spelling without Semantics in a Case of Multi-Infarct DementiaCortex, 1989
- Written spelling agraphia*1Brain and Language, 1989
- A cognitive analysis of an acquired dysgraphic patient with an “allographic” writing disorderCognitive Neuropsychology, 1989
- Processes in handwriting: A case for caseCognitive Neuropsychology, 1989
- The role of the Graphemic Buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphiaCognition, 1987
- Dissociation of spelling errors in written and oral spelling: The role of allographic conversion in writingCognitive Neuropsychology, 1986
- Cognitive analysis of a case of pure dysgraphiaBrain and Language, 1985
- Dysgraphia for letters: a form of motor memory deficit?Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1983
- Agraphia selective for written spelling: An experimental case studyBrain and Language, 1974
- A case showing selectively impaired oral spelling.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1965