Evaluating sex therapy: Process and outcome at the masters & Johnson institute
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 17 (4) , 301-318
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498109551123
Abstract
Research statistics on sex therapy at the Masters & Johnson Institute have been misinterpreted by some individuals. The category of cases reported in Human Sexual Inadequacy (1970) and Textbook of Sexual Medicine (1979) as failures actually includes both outright failures and cases that showed some degree of improvement less than unequivocal reversal of the sexual symptomatology. Furthermore, only one out of 50 applicant couples are denied therapy due to screening; many troubled marriages or couples where one partner has nonsexual psychopathology are routinely accepted for treatment. Additional descriptions of process and outcome research at the Masters & Johnson Institute are discussed to allow readers to develop a clearer understanding of the significance of these findings, including the fact that data on a sizable “waiting list control group” have now been reviewed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiological and psychological factors in impotenceThe Journal of Sex Research, 1981
- Predicting the Outcome of PsychotherapyArchives of General Psychiatry, 1980
- Measuring the outcomes of psychotherapy: Findings of the Penn Psychotherapy Project.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979
- Criteria for Evaluating PsychotherapyArchives of General Psychiatry, 1978
- Therapist interpersonal skills: Process, outcome, methodological considerations, and recommendations for future research.Psychological Bulletin, 1978