A comparison of the responses of two cultivars of late-autumn-sown wheat to applied nitrogen
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- crops and-soils
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 125 (1) , 11-24
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600074451
Abstract
At four pairs of sites in the UK, two cultivars of wheat, bred either for autumn (cv. Mercia) or for spring (cv. Tonic) sowing were sown in November 1988 and 1989 and their yield response to springapplied fertilizer N assessed over the range 0–320 kg/ha N. Grain samples were taken at harvest and analysed for those qualities regarded as indicators of suitability for milling. In five experiments, the grain yield of Mercia was up to 1 t/ha greater than that of Tonic, but overall there was no consistent difference between the two cultivars in the optimum economic yield (Yopt)or in the amount of fertilizer N needed to produce it (Nopt). Both cultivars produced c. 17·5 kg of grain per kg of fertilizer N applied up to Nopl. In the five experiments in which Tonic yielded less, it produced grain of greater N concentration than Mercia when given the same amount of fertilizer N. Differences in grain N concentration, while small (< 0·3%), were significant when analysed across sites. In six experiments both cultivars produced grain of 11 % protein at Nopt. There were no consistent or worthwhile increases in specific weight, Hagberg falling number (HFN) or response to the sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation test of either cultivar from applying more fertilizer N than Nopl. The average specific weight of Mercia grain was 2·5 kg/hi greater than that of Tonic, while Tonic gave larger SDS values of c. 8. There was little difference in HFN. It was concluded that the yield requirement for fertilizer N was similar for these two cultivars of wheat when sown in late autumn, and there was no need to apply differential fertilizer N applications to the cultivars to produce grain of the quality needed for breadmaking. In four experiments the application of plant growth regulator (PGR) increased the yields of both cultivars by c. 0·5 t/ha.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of sowing date on the uptake of and responses to soil and fertilizer nitrogen by the spring wheat cultivar TonicThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1995
- Effects of cultivation and nitrification inhibitor on soil nitrogen availability after a grass ley and on the response of the following cereal crop to fertilizer nitrogenThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1991
- Evidence for differences between cultivars in responsiveness of wheat to applied nitrogenAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1991
- The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrationsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1987
- Effects of spring nitrogen fertilizer on the Hagberg falling number of grain from breadmaking varieties of winter wheatThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1986
- Differences in response of winter cereal varieties to applied nitrogen in the field I. Some factors affecting the variability of responses between sites and seasonsField Crops Research, 1985
- Quality requirements: milling wheatPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- The effects of a granular nitrogen fertilizer and a foliar spray of urea on the yield and bread-making quality of ten winter wheatsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1976
- The effects of alteration of grain moisture content by wetting or drying on the test weight of four winter wheatsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1975
- Productivity and Quality Response of Five Spring Wheat Genotypes, Triticum aestivum L., to Nitrogen Fertilizer1Agronomy Journal, 1971