Predicting the incidence of mohua predation from the seedfall, mouse, and predator fluctuations in beech forests
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Zoology
- Vol. 23 (3) , 287-293
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1996.9518087
Abstract
Predator control will be required to save many mohua (Mohoua ochrocephala) populations from extinction. However, control may be required only in years when stoat (Mustela erminea) densities are high. To manage local stoat populations effectively, a reliable predictor of high risk years is required. We examined whether different levels of beech seedfall and mouse capture rates were related to the levels of mohua predation recorded in the Hawdon Valley, Arthur's Pass National Park, and the Eglinton Valley, Fiordland National Park, between 1989 and 1994. During this period there was only one full beech mast year in each study area during autumn. The full mast seedfall in Hawdon Valley was predominantly of mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) and red beech (N. fused), and in Eglinton Valley it was predominantly silver beech (TV. menziesii). During the following summer, mouse and stoat densities, and the predation rate of adult mohua, all increased considerably. There was very little predation on adult mohua in the summers following poor seedfalls when mouse and predator densities remained low. In 1993, a partial mast did not trigger a mouse or stoat irruption. We conclude that counts of beech seedfall and indices of mouse density are potential predictors of an impending irruption of key predators. Winter mouse density appeared to be the most reliable indicator, because neither stoats nor mice respond to seedfall alone. A combination of these indicators could be used as a basis for management decisions on whether to undertake stoat control to protect mohua populations in the future. However, more information is required on the seedfall thresholds that may trigger sufficient increases in mouse and stoat numbers and, consequently, bird predation.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors affecting the numbers of house mice(Mus musculus)in hard beech(Nothofagus truncata)forestJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 1996
- The effect of bait type, tunnel design, and trap position on stoat control operations for conservation managementNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1996
- Control of a stoat (Mustela erminea) population irruption to enhance mohua (yellowhead) (Mohoua ochrocephala) breeding success in New ZealandNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1996
- Predators and the decline of New Zealand forest birds: An introduction to the hole‐nesting bird and predator programmeNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1996
- Silver beech (Nothofagus menziesii(Hook. f.) Oerst.) seedfall patterns in the Takitimu Range, South Island, New ZealandNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1991
- Annual Seedfall Variation in Nothofagus solandri (Fagaceae), Canterbury, New ZealandOikos, 1990
- The Relationships between Beech (Nothofagus Sp.) Seedfall and Populations of Mice (Mus musculus), and the Demographic and Dietary Responses of Stoats (Mustela erminea), in Three New Zealand ForestsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1983
- Age structure and reproduction in feral New Zealand populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus), in relation to seedfall of southern beechNew Zealand Journal of Zoology, 1982