Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 31 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet Oncology
- Vol. 8 (5) , 411-419
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70136-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic CarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2005
- The Prognostic Significance of Tertiary Gleason Patterns of Higher Grade in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2000
- Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- A gleason score of 7 predicts a worse outcome for prostate carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapyCancer, 1998
- Analysis of Risk Factors for Progression in Patients with Pathologically Confined Prostate Cancers After Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1996
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- The prognostic importance of gleason grade in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A long-term follow-up study of 648 patients treated with radiation therapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A perspectiveHuman Pathology, 1992
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974
- The Histology and Prognosis of Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1967