Do solar-neutrino experiments imply new physics?
- 15 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 47 (4) , 1298-1301
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.47.1298
Abstract
None of the 1000 solar models in a full Monte Carlo simulation is consistent with the results of the chlorine or the Kamiokande experiments. Even if the solar models are forced artificially to have a neutrino flux in agreement with the Kamiokande experiment, none of the fudged models agrees with the chlorine observations. The GALLEX and SAGE experiments, which currently have large statistical uncertainties, differ from the predictions of the standard solar model by and , respectively.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standard solar models, with and without helium diffusion, and the solar neutrino problemReviews of Modern Physics, 1992
- Implications of the GALLEX determination of the solar neutrino fluxPhysics Letters B, 1992
- Solar neutrinos observed by GALLEX at Gran SassoPhysics Letters B, 1992
- Seesaw model solutions of the solar neutrino problemNuclear Physics B, 1992
- Search for neutrinos from the Sun using the reaction(,GePhysical Review Letters, 1991
- Shapes of solar-neutrino spectra: Unconventional tests of the standard electroweak modelPhysical Review D, 1991
- Solution of the solar-neutrino problemPhysical Review Letters, 1990
- Results from one thousand days of real-time, directional solar-neutrino dataPhysical Review Letters, 1990
- Observation ofsolar neutrinos in the Kamiokande-II detectorPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- Solar models, neutrino experiments, and helioseismologyReviews of Modern Physics, 1988