Bacterial Identification, Clinical Significance, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Acinetobacter ursingii and Acinetobacter schindleri , Two Frequently Misidentified Opportunistic Pathogens
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 44 (12) , 4471-4478
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01535-06
Abstract
The species belonging to the Acinetobacter genus are currently reported as opportunistic pathogens in hospitalized patients with underlying predispositions. However, except for the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex, the identification of other species is frequently unreliable, especially for Acinetobacter ursingii and Acinetobacter schindleri , newly described in 2001. Thus, the clinical significance, phenotypic features, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of these two misidentified species remain unclear. Of 456 Acinetobacter sp. clinical strains isolated from 2002 to 2005 in Henri Mondor Hospital, 15 isolates (10 A. ursingii and 5 A. schindleri isolates) were studied. They were characterized using a phenotypic approach (API 20 NE and VITEK 2 systems), 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents with evaluation of impact in clinical relevance. The two corresponding type strains were also included for comparison. All isolates were identified to the species level using molecular tools, whereas the phenotypic methods remained unreliable due to the absence of these two species in the manufacturers' databases. However, the API 20 NE system appeared to be a reasonably reliable phenotypic alternative for the identification of A. ursingii when the numerical code 0000071 was found. Conversely, no discriminative phenotypic alternative existed for A. schindleri isolates. Concerning antimicrobial susceptibility, A. ursingii strains appeared to be more resistant to antibiotics than A. schindleri strains, which could imply therapeutic consequences. Finally, the prevalence of infections caused by A. ursingii and A. schindleri (representing 9.7% and 4.8% of non- A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex strains, respectively) seems to be underestimated.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nosocomial Bacteremia Due to an As Yet Unclassified Acinetobacter Genomic Species 17-Like StrainJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing versus the API 20 NE System and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB Card for Identification of Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Clinical LaboratoryJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Species-Level Identification of Isolates of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus - Acinetobacter baumannii Complex by Sequence Analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Spacer RegionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter spp. in EuropeClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2004
- Septicemia Due to Acinetobacter juniiJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Aerators as a reservoir of Acinetobacter junii: an outbreak of bacteraemia in paediatric oncology patientsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2000
- Acinetobacter species as nosocomial pathogensEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Phylogenetic Relationship of the Twenty-One DNA Groups of the Genus Acinetobacter as Revealed by 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence AnalysisInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1997
- Evaluation of the ability of a commercial system to identifyAcinetobacter genomic speciesEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Clinical strains of Acinetobacter classified by DNA‐DNA hybridizationAPMIS, 1989