Pretransplant Donor-Specific Antibodies in Cytotoxic Negative Crossmatch Kidney Transplants: Are They Relevant?
- 27 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 85 (8) , 1200-1204
- https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e31816b1c37
Abstract
The corresponding antigens of alloantibodies identified in patients awaiting kidney transplantation are often listed as unacceptable for transplantation. The use of solid phase testing, being more sensitive and accurate than conventional complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, has resulted in increased identification of alloantibodies. We aimed to study the clinical importance of alloantibodies defined solely by solid phase techniques. All patients transplanted between 1999 and 2001 at our center with available day-of-transplant sera (D0) were included (121 patients). All had negative CDC crossmatches. Thirty-eight patients (31%) had detectable alloantibodies using high-definition assays with 16 having donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and 22 non-DSA. There were no cases of hyperacute rejection in any of the groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates in the DSA and non-DSA were similar to the unsensitized group. Delayed graft function and 1-year graft survival rates were also similar for the three groups as were median 1-year serum creatinine levels. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that DSA were associated with an increased relative risk of longer-term graft failure (relative risk, 6.5; P<0.05). These data show that in the context of a CDC-negative crossmatch, the presence of D0 DSA has little impact on any early graft parameters. DSA, however, are associated with poorer longer-term graft outcomes in kidney transplantation.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal AllograftsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2006
- A comparison of CDC and luminex for the detection of HLA antibodyHuman Immunology, 2005
- Multilaboratory Evaluation of Serum Analysis for HLA Antibody and Crossmatch Reactivity by Lymphocytotoxicity MethodsArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2003
- Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomesTransplantation, 2002
- Characterization of HLA class I specific antibodies by ELISA using solubilized antigen targets: II. clinical relevanceHuman Immunology, 2001
- Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric TransplantNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A novel strategy for the detection and definition of HLA-specific antibodies in patients awaiting renal transplantationTransplant International, 1998
- ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY FOR ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES—AN ALTERNATIVE TO PANEL STUDIES BY LYMPHOCYTOTOXICITYTransplantation, 1993
- Significance of the Positive Crossmatch Test in Kidney TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1969
- Shwartzman Reaction after Human Renal HomotransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1968