Implementing Employer and Individual Mandates
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 13 (2) , 54-68
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.13.2.54
Abstract
As is true of automobile insurance, a strong case can be made for a mandate that requires individuals to purchase health insurance rather than shifting costs to others. A mandate by itself, however, is likely to be regressive. By dealing with individual needs through the back door, an employer mandate generally keeps costs hidden and raises employment problems, while an employer subsidy will be poorly targeted. An individual mandate, in turn, raises other difficult administrative issues of collection and enforcement. No employer mandate is sufficient without an individual mandate, and millions of Americans will fall outside of any mandated system.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum WageILR Review, 1992
- A Consumer-Choice Health Plan for the 1990sNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989