Distribution and Efficiency Effects of Alternative Recreation Funding Methods
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Leisure Research
- Vol. 21 (4) , 327-347
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1989.11969809
Abstract
This paper examines the distribution effects of alternative recreation funding methods. Review of background concepts and case studies of local and distant recreation users of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in northern Minnesota and of Colorado resident and nonresident participants in the Pikes Peak Marathon demonstrate the effects of entry fee and travel cost on the distribution of the loss in recreation benefits caused by alternative pricing programs. Discussion of this kind is needed to help stimulate thought and build a consensus for pricing goals in outdoor recreation.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF FUNDING ALTERNATIVES FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION IN THE UNITED STATESReview of Policy Research, 1987
- Omitted Cross-Price Variable Biases in the Linear Travel Cost Model: Correcting Common MisperceptionsLand Economics, 1985
- Chapter 15 The economics of outdoor recreationPublished by Elsevier ,1985
- Including equity in the evaluation of outdoor recreation benefitsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1982
- Theory of equity in pricing for resource conservationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1980
- Equity-Efficiency Tradeoffs in Natural Resource Management. The Case of CongestionJournal of Environmental Systems, 1979
- Some Problems in Estimating the Demand for Outdoor RecreationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1975
- Effects of Pricing a "Free" Good: A Study of the Use of Admission Fees at the California Academy of SciencesLand Economics, 1974
- Resource Investments, Impact Distribution, and Evaluation ConceptsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1971
- Hot and crowded: Influence of population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971