Duration of end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant outcome
Open Access
- 16 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 20 (1) , 167-175
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh541
Abstract
Background. Patients nearing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) increasingly choose pre-emptive renal transplant (PRT) to avoid pre-transplant dialysis and to minimize ESRD. Compared with long-term dialysis, PRT has been shown to increase allograft survival. However, the merit of short-term dialysis is not well characterized, and it may be the better medical choice in some patients. The goal of the study was to characterize the relationship between the duration of dialysis vs allograft and patient survival. Methods. We performed a retrospective nationwide cohort study of all kidney transplants (Tx) between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1999, with a follow-up period through December 31, 2000. Participants were identified using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), which tracks all ESRD cases in the nation including patients on dialysis and with kidney Tx. Patients with the history of more than one kidney Tx were excluded. Allograft survival and recipient survival were the primary outcomes of this study. Duration of ESRD as a continuous variable as well as divided into categories (14 days, 15–60 days, 61–180 days, 181–365 days, 1–2 years, 2–3 years, 3–5 years and >5 years) was the primary risk factor of interest. Models were adjusted for multiple donor and recipient factors, including demographics and co-morbidities, as well as for Tx procedure characteristics. Results. A total of 81 130 patient records were used for analysis (age 44.1±14.3 years, 61% males, 24% black, 29% diabetic, pre-transplant ESRD duration 27.1±26.4 months, 26% living donors). ESRD duration, as a continuous variable, is associated with a modest increase in the risk of graft failure over time [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 per year of ESRD duration, Pvs longer durations), the increased risk of allograft failure reached statistical significance only when the time on dialysis was ≥181 days. The duration of ESRD was a significant risk for recipient death (HR 1.04 per year, PConclusions. This study of USRDS records suggests that a short (<6 months) dialysis course has no detrimental effect on graft and patient survival, and should not be deferred if medically indicated.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of 3‐yr cadaveric graft survival based on pre‐transplant variables in a large national datasetClinical Transplantation, 2003
- Preemptive Kidney TransplantationJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2002
- Effect of the Use or Nonuse of Long-Term Dialysis on the Subsequent Survival of Renal Transplants from Living DonorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- People with Dementia Use Schemata to Support Episodic MemoryDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2000
- Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcomeKidney International, 2000
- Impact of pre-existing donor hypertension and diabetes mellitus on cadaveric renal transplant outcomesAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2000
- Early Experience with Dual Kidney Transplantation in Adults using Expanded Donor CriteriaJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 1999
- High-risk donors: expanding donor criteriaTransplantation Proceedings, 1999
- Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplantKidney International, 1998
- EFFECT OF DONOR AGE ON OUTCOME OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1994