Financial Conflicts of Interest in Physicians' Relationships with the Pharmaceutical Industry — Self-Regulation in the Shadow of Federal Prosecution
- 28 October 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 351 (18) , 1891-1900
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmlim042229
Abstract
Studdert et al. describe recent efforts by the federal government and professional organizations to tighten the regulation of financial associations between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Payments to doctors (including gifts and consulting fees) by drug companies are violations of the federal anti-kickback law if the payments have the potential to increase the recipients' prescriptions for the companies' products. The Office of the Inspector General, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and physicians' organizations have issued guidelines prohibiting many types of financial relationships that have been common.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctors and Drug CompaniesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- The New Medicare Prescription-Drug LegislationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- All Gifts Large and SmallAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2003
- The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costsJournal of Health Economics, 2003
- Collaborating with Industry — Choices for the Academic Medical CenterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Financial IndigestionJAMA, 2000
- Uneasy Alliance — Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical IndustryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving BiasesJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1997
- Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formularyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Understanding Financial Conflicts of InterestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993