Constructing Opportunities for Contribution: Structuring Intertextual Coherence and “Problematizing” in Organizational Studies
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 40 (5) , 1023-1062
- https://doi.org/10.5465/256926
Abstract
Examining a sample of journal articles, we develop a grounded theory of contribution that shows how organization studies theorists textually construct opportunities for making contributions to the field. The analyses reveal two major processes and the associated rhetorical practices that texts invoke in establishing opportunities for contribution. The study's findings point to the richness of contribution by illuminating how uniqueness claims are textually produced and legitimated in the context of science. The construction of contribution in organization studies is more complicated than has been assumed.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lines of authority: readings of foundational texts on the profession of managementJournal of Management History (Archive), 1996
- The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization StudiesJournal of Management Inquiry, 1993
- Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteriaQualitative Sociology, 1990
- What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?Academy of Management Review, 1989
- Deconstructing the defense for quantification in social science: A content analysis of journal articles on the parametric strategyQualitative Sociology, 1986
- Learning the Craft of Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1983
- THE USE OF GROUNDED THEORY FOR THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOURJournal of Management Studies, 1983
- Textual Persuasion: The Role of Social Accounting in the Construction of Scientific ArgumentsPhilosophy of the Social Sciences, 1981
- Philosophy as a Kind of Writing: An Essay on DerridaNew Literary History, 1978
- The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver ResearchAmerican Sociological Review, 1976