DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND IMAGING STUDIES ARE UNNECESSARY IN MEN WITH UNDETECTABLE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- p. 1337-1340
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199910000-00024
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distant metastasis after radical prostatectomy in patients without an elevated serum prostate specific antigen levelCancer, 1995
- The Incidence of Prostate Cancer Progression with Undetectable Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in a Series of 394 Radical ProstatectomiesJournal of Urology, 1995
- Long-Term (15 Years) Results After Radical Prostatectomy For Clinically Localized (Stage T2c Or Lower) Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- The Incidence and Significance of Detectable Levels of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1994
- 5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- Recurrent Prostate Cancer Despite Undetectable Prostate Specific AntigenJournal of Urology, 1992
- Prostate Specific Antigen: A Critical Assessment of the Most Useful Tumor Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1991
- Prostate Specific Antigen in the Staging of Localized Prostate Cancer: Influence of Tumor Differentiation, Tumor Volume and Benign HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, 1990
- Prostate Specific Antigen: Not Detectable Despite Tumor Progression after Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1989
- Clinical use of Prostate Specific Antigen in Patients with Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1989