Comparison of Coronary Artery Stenting Outcomes in the Eras Before and After the Introduction of Drug-Eluting Stents
- 22 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 117 (16) , 2071-2078
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.725531
Abstract
Background— Few studies have compared medium-term outcomes for drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents, and most are relatively small randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, since the introduction of DES, there has been increased use and duration of use of clopidogrel, statins, and other evidence-based therapies. The purpose of the present study was to compare outcomes for patients who underwent stenting in the eras before and after the introduction of DES. Methods and Results— New York state patients undergoing stenting in all nonfederal hospitals in the state were studied. Patients were excluded if they had a previous revascularization. Risk factors that were significant predictors of adverse outcomes were used to adjust adverse outcome rates. The study included 11 436 patients who received stents between October 1, 2002, and March 31, 2003, and 12 926 patients who underwent stenting between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004. Death rates, the combined end point of death and myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal MI requiring readmission, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization were compared at 2 years. Patients in the DES era had significantly better risk-adjusted outcomes for death/MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.97), 9.9% versus 10.8%; nonfatal MI requiring readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.97); target vessel revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.64), 11.2% versus 17.9%; and target lesion revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.59), 8.4% versus 14.7%. Conclusions— Patients in the DES era experienced lower rates of death/MI, nonfatal MI, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization, but there were no differences in the rates of death. These improvements are likely a result of increased use of clopidogrel, statins, and dual antiplatelet therapy, in addition to the introduction of DES.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Outcomes of 6906 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting StentsCirculation, 2006
- Trading Restenosis for Thrombosis? New Questions about Drug-Eluting StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (A Meta-Analysis)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare metal stentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Randomized Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Slow- and Moderate-Release Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery LesionsCirculation, 2003
- Angiographic Findings of the Multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL)Circulation, 2002
- Improved Clinical Outcome after Widespread Use of Coronary-Artery Stenting in CanadaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Intravascular Stents to Prevent Occlusion and Re-Stenosis after Transluminal AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987