A randomized prospective trial comparing three established methods of gastric decompression after vagotomy
- 1 August 1972
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 59 (8) , 605-608
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800590806
Abstract
One hundred and thirty-two patients who were about to undergo vagotomy and drainage were randomly allocated nasogastric tubes, gastrostomy tubes, or no decompression postoperatively. Significantly fewer patients with no decompression developed respiratory infections postoperatively. The role of smoking in the production of post-operative chest complications was again confirmed. Neither the choice of decompression nor its absence appeared to affect postoperative electrolyte control. Postoperative dysphagia was more common in the group with a nasogastric tube. Wound infections were commoner in the gastrostomy group. While most patients with gastrostomies expressed a preference for this type of decompression a proportion of those with nasogastric tubes expressed a preference for a gastrostomy.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tubes for gastric aspiration after vagotomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969
- Stomach drainage after vagotomy and pyloroplastyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1967
- A New Gastrostomy CatheterBMJ, 1964
- Postoperative Decompression by Temporary Gastrostomy or Nasogastric TubeArchives of Surgery, 1962
- An Evaluation of Temporary Gastrotomy–A Substitute for Nasogastric SuctionAnnals of Surgery, 1956
- PEPTIC ULCERS PERFORATING INTO THE PANCREASAnnals of Surgery, 1939