What Happened on Deliberation Day?
Preprint
- 1 June 2006
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
What are the effects of deliberation about political issues? This essay reports the results of a kind of Deliberation Day, involving sixty-three citizens in Colorado. Groups from Boulder, a predominantly liberal city, met and discussed global warming, affirmative action, and civil unions for same-sex couples; groups from Colorado Springs, a predominately conservative city, met to discuss the same issues. The major effect of deliberation was to make group members more extreme than they were when they started to talk. Liberals became more liberal on all three issues; conservatives became more conservative. As a result, the division between the citizens of Boulder and the citizens of Colorado Springs were significantly increased as a result of intragroup deliberation. Deliberation also increased consensus, and dampened diversity, within the groups. Implications are explored for the uses and structure of deliberation in general.Keywords
This publication has 94 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chevron as a Voting RuleThe Yale Law Journal, 2007
- The Judiciary and Economic DevelopmentSSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- What Happened on Deliberation Day?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006
- Justice Breyer's Democratic PragmatismThe Yale Law Journal, 2006
- Beyond Marbury: The Executive's Power to Say What the Law IsThe Yale Law Journal, 2006
- The Superiority of an Ideal Consumption Tax Over an Ideal Income TaxSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- International Law: A Welfarist ApproachSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Political Constraints on Supreme Court ReformSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- The Availability Heuristic, Intuitive Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Climate ChangeSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Statistics, not memories: what was the standard of care for administering antenatal steroids to women in preterm labor between 1985 and 2000?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003