Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Swedish Elite Track and Field Athletes
- 3 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 40 (1) , 163-169
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511425467
Abstract
Background: Little is known of injury patterns in track and field (athletics). Injury prevalence has been proposed as the most appropriate measure of the injury rate in sports where athletes are at risk for overuse problems. Purpose: To ascertain 1-year retrospective and current prevalence of injury in elite track and field athletes to help plan injury prevention programs for this sport. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Two hundred seventy-eight youth (16 years old) and adult athletes from an eligible study population of 321 athletes were included. Results: The 1-year retrospective injury prevalence was 42.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.9%-49.0%); the point prevalence was 35.4% (95% CI, 29.7%-41.4%). The diagnosis group displaying the highest injury prevalence was inflammation and pain in the gradual onset category (1-year prevalence, 20.9%; 95% CI, 16.2%-26.2%; and point prevalence, 23.2%; 95% CI, 18.4%-28.7%). A strong tendency for higher 1-year prevalence of 16.5% (95% CI, 12.2%-21.4%) than point prevalence of 8.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-12.5%) was recorded for sudden onset injuries in the diagnosis group sprain, strain, and rupture. The body region showing the highest injury prevalence was the knee and lower leg with 15.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-19.8%) 1-year prevalence and 13.7% (95% CI, 9.8%-18.3%) point prevalence, followed by the Achilles tendon, ankle, and foot/toe with 11.7% (95% CI, 8.2%-16.1%) 1-year prevalence and 11.4% (95% CI, 7.9%-15.8%) point prevalence. Conclusion: The injury prevalence is high among Swedish elite track and field athletes. Most of the injuries affect the lower extremities and are associated with a gradual onset. Although it is associated with a potential recall bias, the 1-year retrospective prevalence measure captured more sudden onset injuries than the point prevalence measure. Future prospective studies in track and field are needed to identify groups of athletes at increased risk.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Injury surveillance in male professional football; is medical staff reporting complete and accurate?Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2011
- Occurrence of injuries and illnesses during the 2009 IAAF World Athletics ChampionshipsBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Overuse Injuries in Professional Road CyclistsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- No injuries, but plenty of pain? On the methodology for recording overuse symptoms in sportsBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Epidemiology of Severe Injuries among United States High School AthletesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Sports Injuries Surveillance During the 2007 IAAF World Athletics ChampionshipsClinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2009
- Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathyBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrixInjury Prevention, 2002
- Risk Factors for Stress FracturesSports Medicine, 1999
- Track and field athletics injuries--a one-year survey.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994