Survey of Urological Centres and Review of Current Practice in the Pre‐operative Assessment of Prostatism
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 70 (1) , 43-45
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15662.x
Abstract
A survey of 24 urological centres has shown a wide variation in the routine pre-operative assessment of patients being considered for prostatectomy. Imaging of the urinary tract by intravenous urography (IVU) or ultrasound (US) is performed in 21/24 centres (79%) and plain films in 16/24 (67%). Post-micturition residual volume (PMRV) is estimated quantitatively in 10/24 centers (42%). Although there is little agreement on what constitutes a significant PMRV, a large PMRV leads to increased likelihood of operation, and earlier operation. Peak urine flow rate (Q max) is measured in 19/24 centres (79%). The significance of these findings is discussed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Pre‐operative Imaging of the Urinary Tract Worthwhile in the Assessment of Prostatism?British Journal of Urology, 1992
- Outcome of elective prostatectomy.BMJ, 1989
- The “Plain Film” Bladder Shadow in Outflow Obstruction: as Accurate a Discriminant of Residual Urine as UltrasoundBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- Prostatism, Intravenous Urography and Asymptomatic Renal CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- Prostatism: how useful is routine imaging of the urinary tract?BMJ, 1988
- ProstatismScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1982
- The Identification of Patients at Risk from Acute RetentionBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- Excretion Urography in the Investigation of ProstatismBritish Journal of Urology, 1976
- Is Urography Necessary for Patients with Acute Retention of Urine Before Prostatectomy?British Journal of Urology, 1975