Taking the 'sting' out of local anaesthetics
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 125 (5) , 452-455
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14771.x
Abstract
In order to investigate factors influencing the discomfort caused by the injection of different lignocaine preparations, a randomized, double-blind comparison of paired injections was performed in 32 patients. In all subjects 2% plain lignocaine was found to be more painful than 0.5% plain lignocaine. Lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 was found to be significantly more painful than plain lignocaine. The presence of sodium metabisulphite (the antioxidant in commercial adrenalized lignocaine) significantly increased the discomfort. Neutralization of acidic 0.5% lignocaine (pH 4.7) reduced the discomfort caused in 44% of patients, but this was not statistically significant.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neutralized Lidocaine with Epinephrine for Local Anesthesia — IIThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1990
- Neutralized Lidocaine with Epinephrine for Local AnesthesiaThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1989
- Local anesthesia in dermatologic surgeryJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1988
- Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH bufferingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988
- Anesthesia for Dermatologic SurgeryThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1988
- p H-adjusted Lidocaine Does Not “Sting”Anesthesiology, 1987
- Epinephrine and the Obstetric Epidural Test DoseAnesthesiology, 1987
- A Controlled Trial of Pain on Skin Infiltration with Local AnaestheticsAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1984
- Minimizing the Pain of Local AnesthesiaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1983
- Comparison of Compounds Used for Intradermal AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1976