Routine Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy
- 24 April 2000
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 2,p. CD001450
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001450
Abstract
Doppler ultrasound study of umbilical artery waveforms helps identify the compromised fetus in 'high risk' pregnancies and, therefore, deserves assessment as a screening test in 'low risk' pregnancies. One of the main aims of routine antenatal care is to identify the 'at risk' fetus in order to apply clinical interventions which could result in reduced perinatal morbidity and mortality. To assess the effects on obstetric practice and pregnancy outcome of routine Doppler ultrasound in unselected and low risk pregnancies. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: September 1999 Acceptably controlled trials of routine Doppler ultrasound (umbilical circulation and/or uterine circulation) in unselected or low risk pregnancies. Both reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. Authors of two trials were contacted for additional information. Five trials were included which recruited 14,338 women. The methodological quality of the trials was generally good. Based on existing evidence, routine Doppler ultrasound examination in low risk or unselected populations did not result in increased antenatal, obstetric and neonatal interventions, and no overall differences were detected for substantive short term clinical outcomes such as perinatal mortality. There is no available evidence to assess the effect on substantive long term outcomes such as childhood neurodevelopment. There is no available evidence to assess maternal outcomes, particularly psychological effects. In two studies there were unexpected findings suggesting possible harmful effects, but the explanation for this is not clear, and further evaluation regarding the safety of Doppler ultrasound is required. Based on existing evidence, routine Doppler ultrasound in low risk or unselected populations does not confer benefit on mother or baby. Future research should be powerful enough to address small changes in perinatal outcome, and should include evaluation of maternal psychological effects, long term outcomes such as neurodevelopment, and issues of safety.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound velocimetry of the umbilical artery in low risk pregnanciesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- ECPPA: randomised trial of low dose aspirin for the prevention of maternal and fetal complications in high risk pregnant womenBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Ultrasound Safety in ObstetricsUltrasound Quarterly, 1995
- Screening for the compromised fetus: A randomized trial of umbilical artery velocimetry in unselected pregnanciesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studiesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Der Stellenwert der Doppler-sonographie bei der Betreuung von Nicht-Risikoschwangerschaften am GeburtsterminGynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau, 1993
- 452 Umbilical artery doppler waveform analysis: A randomized study on effect on outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Prospektiv randomisierte Untersuchung zum klinischen Wert der Dopplersonographie als ScreeningverfahrenGynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau, 1991
- The validity of screening for small‐for‐gestational‐age and low‐weight‐for‐length infants by Doppler ultrasoundBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989