Correlation Of Minute (0.5 MM or Less) Focus of Prostate Adenocarcinoma On Needle Biopsy With Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: Role of Prostate Specific Antigen Density
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 170 (2) , 370-372
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000074747.72993.cb
Abstract
Purpose: Few studies have examined the radical prostatectomy followup of a minute focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate needle core biopsy. Materials and Methods: We searched the surgical pathology data base (1999 to 2000) for patients with a minute focus of Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma (defined as a single focus less than or equal to a 40 × microscopic field) who subsequently underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution. Potentially insignificant tumors were defined as those with a radical prostatectomy tumor volume of less than 0.5 cc, Gleason score 6 or less and organ confined disease. Results: A total of 54 patients (mean age 58 years, range 45 to 70) were evaluated. The average number of prostate cores per biopsy was 6.3. All had Gleason score 6 by study design. Mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 6.0 (range 0.8 to 15). Average tumor volume at radical prostatectomy was 0.39 cc. Of the 54 tumors 24 (44%) were 0.1 cc or less. Two-thirds of the tumors were clinically potentially insignificant. Using a PSA density (PSAD) cutoff of 0.15 we identified 30 of 36 patients (83%) with potentially insignificant tumors. Of those with a PSAD of 0.15 or less with clinically significant tumors, 5 of 6 still had relatively small, organ confined tumors with Gleason score less than 7. Conclusions: In the era of PSA screening most patients with a minute focus of Gleason score 6 or less adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy had potentially insignificant tumors. However, one-third of patients had clinically significant tumors warranting definitive therapy. The smallest focus of cancer on needle biopsy is not a guarantee of a clinically insignificant tumor. PSAD may have some value within this group in guiding clinicians and patients as to the likelihood of having clinically insignificant tumors.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimensUrology, 2002
- THE PATHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY FINDINGS: IMPLICATIONS AND CURRENT CONTROVERSIESJournal of Urology, 2001
- THE PERCENT OF CORES POSITIVE FOR CANCER IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY SPECIMENS IS STRONGLY PREDICTIVE OF TUMOR STAGE AND VOLUME AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Ability of Sextant Biopsies to Predict Radical Prostatectomy StageUrology, 1998
- Prospective Evaluation of Men With Stage T1C Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997
- Increasing Incidence of Minimal Residual Cancer In Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- Single focus of adenocarcinoma in the prostate biopsy specimen is not predictive of the pathologic stage of diseaseUrology, 1996
- The Volume of Prostate Cancer in the Biopsy Specimen Cannot Reliably Predict the Quantity of Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen on an Individual BasisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Morphometric Measurement of Tumor Volume and Per Cent of Gland Involvement as Predictors of Pathological Stage in Clinical Stage B Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1989