Trauma care research and the war on uncertainty
Open Access
- 10 November 2005
- Vol. 331 (7525) , 1094-1096
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1094
Abstract
Improving trauma care demands large trials—and large trials need funding and collaboration For people aged 5-45 years trauma is second only to HIV/AIDS as a cause of death.1 2 Every day world wide over 300 000 people are severely injured, about 10 000 of whom die. Road traffic crashes and violence are the leading causes. The global number of road deaths is forecast to rise by 65% between 2000 and 2020 and the number of violent deaths has increased steadily, with the 20th century being the most violent on record. Despite the best preventive efforts, providing effective trauma care will remain a major challenge for healthcare professionals. There is considerable potential to improve trauma outcomes by using clinical audit to increase the implementation of evidence based interventions in trauma services.3 However, for many trauma care interventions, the balance of risks and benefits is uncertain and they must be assessed in randomised trials before being implemented. Compared with the disease burden there is a dearth of clinical trials in trauma care and the existing trials are small, contributing to uncertainty about effectiveness (see table).4 For example, few if any of the pharmacological treatments for brain and …Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical researchThe Lancet, 2005
- A CRASH landing in severe head injuryThe Lancet, 2004
- Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10 008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Problems With Indexing and Citation of Articles With Group AuthorshipJAMA, 2002
- Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of researchBMJ, 2002
- Trends in trauma care in England and Wales 1989–97The Lancet, 2000
- Absence of evidence for the effectiveness of five interventions routinely used in the intensive care management of severe head injury: a systematic reviewJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1998
- Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease StudyPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.1997
- Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1993