But do we need universal grammar? Comment on
- 30 November 2004
- Vol. 94 (1) , 77-84
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructions, Lexical Semantics, and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for Generalizations and Subregularities in the Realization of ArgumentsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2005
- Learning argument structure generalizationsCognitive Linguistics, 2004
- Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammarCognition, 2003
- The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of eventsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2002
- Linguistic vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence ComprehensionJournal of Memory and Language, 2000
- From Form To Meaning: A Role for Structural Alignment in the Acquisition of LanguageAdvances in Child Development and Behavior, 1999
- Argument Structure and Learnability: Is a Solution in Sight?Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1996
- Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of SentencesCognitive Psychology, 1996
- The Evolution of Noun IncorporationLanguage, 1984
- Transitivity in Grammar and DiscourseLanguage, 1980