Human Rights, Group Rights, and Peoples' Rights
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Human Rights Quarterly
- Vol. 21 (1) , 80-107
- https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1999.0009
Abstract
A right is a group right only if it is borne by the group qua group. If the individuals who form a group hold rights as separate individuals, their several individual rights do not add up to a group right. For example, scientologists constitute a group whose members might be said to have a right to conduct their lives according to their beliefs (provided that, in doing so, they do not violate the rights of others). In saying that, however, we need not be ascribing a group right to scientologists. Rather, we may be saying only that individuals, including scientologists, have the right to conduct their lives as they choose. Thus, the relevant right is one held by each individual scientologist rather than by scientologists as a collectivity.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- National Self-Determination Today: Problems of Legal Theory and PracticeInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1994
- The Emerging Right to Democratic GovernanceAmerican Journal of International Law, 1992
- Human Rights – Universal Panacea? Some reflections on the so-called human rights of the third generationNetherlands International Law Review, 1990
- National Self-determinationThe Journal of Philosophy, 1990
- Individuals, Groups, and Rights to Public GoodsUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 1988
- Human Rights - What They Are and What They Are NotNordic Journal of International Law, 1987
- Conjuring Up New Human Rights: A Proposal For Quality ControlAmerican Journal of International Law, 1984
- A Third Generation of Solidarity Rights: Progressive Development or Obfuscation of International Human Rights Law?Netherlands International Law Review, 1982
- The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political TheoryWorld Politics, 1977
- Collective Human Rights of Peoples and MinoritiesInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1976