Is routine use of episiotomy justified?
- 31 May 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 174 (5) , 1399-1402
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70579-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repairBMJ, 1994
- Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990
- Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveriesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990
- Episiotomy: Can its routine use be defended?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- PERINEAL MUSCLE FUNCTION AFTER CHILDBIRTHThe Lancet, 1985
- West Berkshire perineal management trial.BMJ, 1984
- Is routine episiotomy necessary?BMJ, 1984
- Benefits and Risks of EpisiotomyObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1983
- Median episiotomies and complete perineal lacerationsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1960