About time: diagnostic guidelines that help clinicians
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (>3) , 205-209
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.3.205
Abstract
Clinical guidelines often make recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests. Compared with sensitivity and specificity, the use of pre- and post-test probabilities allows a more explicit and rational selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Ideally, clinical guidelines relating to diagnosis should routinely incorporate this information to enhance individualised decision making. We report our experience of incorporating pre- and post-test probabilities into a guideline on the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding developed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Issues relating to their application are highlighted, including the limitations of available evidence on diagnostic tests and prevalence of disease, acceptability to guideline users, and the uncertain impact on actual clinical decision making. Despite these potential difficulties, the incorporation of data on pre- and post-test probabilities into the development and presentation of guideline recommendations may offer an important opportunity to make clinical decision making more transparent for both clinicians and patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled studyBMJ, 2002
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: The architecture of diagnostic researchBMJ, 2002
- Ultrasound, hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in the investigation of endometrial cancerBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2001
- Lesson of the week: Playing the odds in clinical decision making: lessons from berry aneurysms undetected by magnetic resonance angiographyBMJ, 2001
- Evaluation of a clinical test. II: Assessment of validityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Diagnosis and general practice.2000
- Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.2000
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic TestsJAMA, 1999
- USE OF THE PROGESTOGEN CHALLENGE TEST TO REDUCE THE RISK OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER1980