Use of algorithms as determinants for individual patient decision making: national comprehensive cancer network versus artificial neural networks
- 1 December 2003
- Vol. 62 (6) , 13-19
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- PREDICTING PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OUTCOME PREOPERATIVELY IN THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERAJournal of Urology, 2001
- Genetic Adaptive Neural Network to Predict Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional StudyMolecular Urology, 2001
- PREDICTING RISK OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH THE CENTER FOR PROSTATE DISEASE RESEARCH AND CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR DATABASESJournal of Urology, 2001
- PREDICTORS OF UTILITIES FOR HEALTH STATES IN EARLY STAGE PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- VALIDATION OF PARTIN TABLES FOR PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- The Danger of Applying Group-level Utilities in Decision Analyses of the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer in Individual PatientsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- An Algorithm for Predicting Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer Using the Results Obtained from Sextant Core Biopsies with Prostate Specific Antigen LevelJournal of Urology, 1996
- The Impact of Co-morbidity on Life Expectancy Among Men with Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1996
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987